I Don't Owe You Anything

Why football fans don't deserve the loyalty they demand

"No loyalty, it's all about money these days, I hope we spend well to replace him"

Words Tweeted, Facebooked and Talksported throughout every transfer window. Displaying a total absence of self-awareness the football fan blusters his way through the summer. Departing players are mercenaries, while arrivals who presumably haven't left anywhere to join their new club are welcomed with a photo-op holding the shirt and the usual clichés of joining a 'big club with a great set of fans'.


Footballers go to work and play football for a living. During their 15 year career nearly all will move clubs at some point. It's no different from you or I moving jobs. Except when we move on, we don't get personal abuse and threats from customers of the company we are leaving. A teacher who moves to another school doesn't get former pupils posting vile comments online. So why has it become so common for the bile and anger to overcome football fans?

The supposed death of loyalty seems to be the trigger for so much rage. There is only one loyalty in football and that is of the supporter to their club. Outside of that fans are just about as fickle as any group of people in the world. When a player is doing well we exalt them. Heavy words are so lightly thrown. Players are freely labelled 'heroes' and 'legends'. If he has a bad game we may show limited loyalty and search for excuses. 'He's carrying a knock', 'he needs a rest', 'he's being played out of position' or even the less vindicating 'he's just having an off day'. But such excuses and loyalty have an expiry date. Depending on the bank of goodwill a player has built up this could be several months or just several misplaced passes. 'Get him off!' can become 'get rid of him' in the space of a few weeks. Where is the loyalty then? Heroes of yesterday are quickly forgotten when a new star rolls into town.

What about managers? They'll sign a player and hail him a key part of the clubs plans. If the player doesn't perform he is dropped and eventually sold or released. To managers, players are a commodity. They are bought, used and then moved on when either their usefulness diminishes or is superseded by the money someone else is prepared to give in exchange. There is no loyalty. Circumstances change. A player may sign a four year contract after being told he's at the heart of the manager's plans. Does that mean the player has to start every game for four years? By football fans' own warped concept of loyalty I suspect it does.

Players can expect limited loyalty from supporters and their managers. So why is it demanded of them? It's funny how the loyalty of a departing reserve player is never questioned. But the second a star thinks about moving on and the gossip columns go into overdrive, posters are ripped off walls and shirts are set ablaze.

I've managed to avoid naming names so far but it's inescapable that this post is on the back of two of the summer's big stories so far. First Fabian Delph and the collapsed transfer to Manchester City. The news broke at the end of last week that he was set to move north. Nothing was official or confirmed but paper-talk was enough to get Aston Villa fans (and football fans generally) frothing at the mouth. Without going into the merits of such a move, it was a shining example of why fans' version of loyalty is so misguided. Delph, Villa's captain and player of the year, was subject to personal attacks and labelling based on something that never even happened. As soon as the story of his transfer broke his good play and invaluable contribution to Aston Villa's season was forgotten. Fans were tripping over their keyboards to label him a 'mercenary' and wish him failure in the future. The usual re-writing of history ('he wasn't that good anyway') was barely underway when the deal fell through and Delph announced he was staying. What must he be thinking? Fans turned on him while at the same time screaming for loyalty.

And finally to Raheem Sterling whose move to Manchester City does look like being completed. Liverpool fans stick to the jilted club script: 'only moving for money, we don't need mercenaries, he wasn't very good anyway'. Come the first day of the season they'll be cheering for players signed from other clubs. Fans of these other clubs will be cursing those who left but cheering for their own new arrivals and so on. Dejan Lovren threatened to go on strike if Southampton didn't let him move to Anfield. The Kop made him very welcome. Whether Sterling is a success or not at Manchester City is irrelevant. He played well for Liverpool and has moved on to what he hopes will be better things. Does he really deserve the vitriol he's been subjected to?